• March 31, 2023

Google Hit With New Lawsuit For Restricting Ad Competition

Google is facing a multi-billion dollar lawsuit in the UK, brought by a British journalist, claiming it has a stranglehold on the ad tech market. The collective claim for £3.6 billion …

End Of CARES Act Home Confinement Is Near For Many Federal Prisoners

The United States Senate voted Wednesday to terminate a COVID-19 pandemic ​national emergency order which had recently been extended by President Joe Biden. The CARES Act was set to expire on …

Supreme Court Will Decide How Aggressive The IRS Can Be When Hunting For A Delinquent Taxpayer’s Assets

As taxpayers and politicians argue about the impact of additional IRS funding, the Supreme Court is taking a look at the rules for collecting financial and other information without notice to …

Some of our elected representatives can’t help themselves, it seems.

Earlier this month senator Elizabeth Warren decided to launch a war on price gouging. The push comes as gasoline prices edge steadily higher biting into household budgets.

A summary of Warren’s bill states the following:

  • It would “prohibit the practice of price gouging during all abnormal market disruptions—including the current pandemic—by authorizing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general to enforce a federal ban against unconscionably excessive price increases, regardless of a seller’s position in a supply chain.”

In other words, companies shouldn’t take advantage of breaks in the supply chain to make a quick buck.

While that may sound noble on its face it is fraught with problems. In fact, the whole effort is nonsensical, backwards and self-defeating, least from an economics viewpoint.

Here’s why.

First, the easiest way for companies to avoid accusations of price gouging will likely exacerbate any price surge. For instance, if the operator of a gasoline station is worried about the state attorney general com ing knocking, then that person would simply stop selling gas and diesel. Problem solved for the person handling the gas station, but not for motorists who will now need to find another source for their fuel. Likely, such a move by producers will lead to further price increases as supply dwindles.


Second, but on no lesser importance it isn’t clear what counts as price gouging. If the cost of oil has increased, and it has, then surely we can expect the price of gasoline to do the same. The two are inextricably linked.

Brent crude oil fetched $119 a barrel recently, up from less than $70 at the beginning of December. Non surprise then that gasoline futures saw a similar move. They were recently trading at approximately $4 a gallon (excludes tax) up from less than $2 in early December.

Third, it seems that not all industries will be treated the same. While oil producers and refiners are an easy target. Likewise, the baby formula shortage is fast turning makers of that food into pariahs.

However, other sectors seem to get away with hiking prices at absurd rates year after year after year. And they do so without comment from our politicians.

The poster child for this is the insurance companies benefiting from the mandatory enrollment in ObamaCare for all residents. The cost for Affordable Care Act (Aka ObamaCare) health insurance coverage jumped another 21% for 2022 versus the year before. Such annual increases seem to have been happening since the introduction of the act more than a decade ago.

If oil producers who don’t control the global price of oil are targets, why shouldn’t health insurance companies be targeted also? I guess that’s where the politicians have some explaining to do.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.